Remux vs bluray reddit Notes from a remux: "Blu-ray looks extremely washed out compared to Netflix WEBRip. " I'm not a pixel peeper, so I do remux in DVDs and 1080 Blu-ray, but encode 4K down to about the same as 1080 size. Blu-Ray Menu: Dune HD and Zappiti have better BR menu engine than Zidoo. Nov 21, 2024 · use the following search parameters to narrow your results: subreddit:subreddit find submissions in "subreddit" author:username find submissions by "username" site:example. Source is legi0n Debating between 4K Remux vs Encode as I'm in between upgrading some of my encode to remuxes and wondering if I should upgrade my entire collection or just some Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. At half the size too. On standard Blu-Ray it's very dark, deep black and looks amazing. Consensus seems to be Cameron couldn’t resist wacking his new releases with the DNR and “AI” stick, though Titanic and The Abyss aren’t as bad as True Lies or Aliens, and none are as bad as T2. The streaming image is usually sharper and more detailed but the Blu-ray image is undoubtedly more stable, especially when it comes to more complicated shots with lots of moving parts or darker scenes. The runtime printed on the box states the 4k is 394 minutes and the standard is 456, so just slightly over an hour longer. Other than that, I can't say I mind the change. com REMUX are lossless BluRays. Need help deciding on Plasma vs OLED and Region-Free Blu-Ray vs WEBDL-2160p & Bluray-2160p & Remux-2160p All in Same Profile. Collection Management GUI: Zidoo, Dune HD, and Zappiti has nice collection GUI. There are huge communities around encoding. 2014. And also FraMeSToR is the best group? that uploads REMUX. 60K subscribers in the 4kbluray community. MA. I also have a handful of blu-ray TV Series, and those add up fast (around 13 completes series i've purchased and ripped, about 8. Oct 6, 2024 · A Remux is a direct copy from a Blu-ray or dvd without any additional (lossy) compression to reduce the filesize. Probably this Blu-ray comment from Kalroth 4y ago still applies… BluRay is simply the media source. BDRip - Encoded from the remux. It will just be at a much higher bitrate than Netflix or Hulu. Follow this order: 1080p bluray > 4k web-dl > 4k bluray > 1080p web-dl. The improvement you see in 4KDHR vs 4k is more like going from standard definition to HD than HD to 4k. i know bigger size isnt always better since 2160p is h265 while remux is still h264 Archived post. A web rip should always be worst quality than a remux. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now IMAX Web-Dl vs Blu-ray UHD for Marvel Movies . Or check it out in the app stores Godzilla vs Kong: 4K HDR Blu Ray remux 43,6 GB vs 4K HDR 10 10mbit is also at about the level where most() people really can't tell the difference at 1080p compared to a 25gb+ 1080p remux (varies according to the film and how much you notice compression artefacts - plex server owners probably don't count as most people here) We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 265 10-bit, CRF18, preset slow, main10@L5. The list of low quality Blu-ray encoders is long and growing every month. The main concern I have is the black level in space. 5MB/s Bitrate. That all changed with UHD Blu-Ray which introduced newer codecs. I don't know that it really matters which player you use as long as when you are watching HDR content it is on an HDR display. x265 is an encoded 4K BluRay. All of mine is physical media so far. No. Especially on my LG CX. " Unfortunately it doesn't look better. 1-ShocK - 21. In the end it all comes down to your viewing experience. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The true source of highest quality is the raw format files taken by the camera. Also have to tried comparing the remux with the BD encode? 5TB is a decent amount but it's filling up fast when most blu-ray files are around 30gb and most 4k blu-rays are around 60gb. But, I only use MakeMKV to make the full disc backup and then manually create the MKV from the blu-ray folders on the hard drive using eac3to and MKVtoolnix. Tigole is my go to for new movies, especially bluray releases. like it wasn't tonemapped. Home. When they produce a blu ray, they can take a 500GB file of a movie which can be a RAW file, and encode it down to fit onto a blu ray. AVC. But would it make more sense to grab the Web-DL of movies like this and remux with the better TrueHD 7. 4K Blu-ray discs run at up to 128Mbps. 7 mb/s the REMUX will have a much higher bits/pixel ratio and all things being equal would look better. Remux is just like shedded version on Blu-ray,scraping extras and audios nothiing different I just bought a new TV recently and were wondering what is the best choice for quality or perception between HDR10+ and the remux version. Donc pour un film, je peux obtenir du Bluray-1080p, du WEBDL-1080p (qui est pire que le Bluray) ou du remux-1080p Je sais que… Remux means the data has been copied over to a new container (eg mkv) without re-encoding and therefore preserving the original quality. Blu-Ray is encoded so that it preserves quality but reduces file size (the encoder does a lot of math to do this). I use FGT, HDCLUB, BLUHD, BTN, NOGRP, FraMeSToR, TRiToN, CiNEPHiLES and GHD. 7. If you do your own high-quality encodings, I have found that you can shrink both 1080p BluRay and 4K BluRay down to about half their Remux size (on average) without any visual quality loss. There is movement throughout the soundscape and beefy bass when I was wondering, is there much of a difference between let's say a 70gb remux compared to something like a decent 20-30gb encoded bluray rip? Is it really worth the extra space these files take up when viewed on a nice big screen, or is there a point of diminishing returns if the encode is good enough? also forgive me if this question has been It used to be that you could pretty much garuantee that a blu-ray remux was H. Personally I think it's worth doing remux and preserving highest quality--as technology (and storage prices) improve, you'll be glad you didn't cut corners and compress/reduce your files. Or commentary tracks or alternative audio tracks. Cosmos. 264 was in very common usage, and the whole point of a remux is that it doesn't touch the source video stream. 1-NOGRP[rartv] Cosmos. As you may know the 4k comes with both the 4k discs and the standard 1080 discs. TrueHD. If you want lossless audio and have ample and I mean ample HDD space, go for Remux for your favorite shows especially those with stellar cinematography. The Dolby Atmos soundtrack (which is offered on both standard Blu-ray and 4K) is rich and dynamic. 265. LG 55CX / Denon AVR-X2400H / Q Acoustic 2050's + 2000C + 2070S + 2020's / Sony BDP-S5200 (Region A) / Panasonic DP-UB450EB / Nvidia SHIELD 16Gb / Xbox Series X / PS5 We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. TERMINAL is a Scene release group. Heyo, like everyone I've been sort of scrambling since Rarbg shut down. Also keep in mind that sometimes files have to be encoded a certain way depending on the device you're playing back on (For example, playing back an mkv directly on an LG OLED requires DTS audio and Dolby Vision video to be remuxed to play correctly) The codecs and sources are two different things. Any time you re-encode a blu-ray, (which is what a Rip is) you will get some amount of compression artifacts and light banding. Obviously you can rip it in much higher bitrates or just remux. Many 4K WEB-DL's are bit-starved fake upscales with awful HDR grading so the Blu-ray version will be superior. I recently set up a home theatre system and want to learn how to watch movies in the best possible quality to fully utilise my sound and screen setup. 1 DV HEVC HYBRID REMUX-FraMeSToR Tenet 2020 UHD BluRay 2160p DTS-HD MA 5. BluRay. 50 GB There are differences in the size of the file. Remux means the data has been copied (often simply to a new container like mkv) without any changes. Unfotunately, my storage and bandwidth capacity doesn't allow for that. BRRip - Means it has been re-encoded from an existing bluray encode, which results in further quality loss compared to a regular bluray encode (which itself is encoded from the full bluray/remux): https://redd. IMO encodes in the 1-2GB range are fine if you have a good monitor to enjoy them along with good audio setup. Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About 4K Remux or any bluray Remux is 1:1 with disc. Reply reply Shout doesn't have 4K rights. Go for a high efficiency codec (HEVC, VP9, AV1), especially if you want to save storage & bandwidth but also have decent hardware & software. Remuxes (in MKV format) allow you to preserve multiple audio and subtitle tracks. 264 and VC-1 and only H. Has anyone got the new Planet earth 3 UHD? I have a question regarding the run times on the 4K Blu Ray vs the standard one. 5mb/s and 4K WEB-DL 14. The smaller Bluray rips use the remux files which are then re-encoded to a smaller size. Some (usually scene releases) will simply run it through generic "catch-all" settings for an encoder and you end up with a pretty good rip. On a 13. Year. 3 Mb/s IMAX 2160p BluRay is simply the media source. You preserve the "Original Quality" bitrate from the disc. The Oppo clones are the best of the bunch for BR menu support though (as its firmware & hardware are based on a real disc player). So if you are seeing the same thing there then it is just whatever the studio/filmmakers decided to distribute. Some torrented files are full 4K Bluray quality, others are compressed down. Remux is short for Remultiplex. If that remux was from the Blu-ray 3D of Avatar and was properly re-encoded, then yes. TERMiNAL does some good work with releasing UHD HDR HEVC encodes around 20gb, which I find preferable to even BluRay Remux's. Video themselves might be different and have more or less foreign language audio tracks, more or less subtitles, different Menus, etc. I’d advise getting the remux, but if you’re looking for the absolute highest quality version of Apocalypse Now you might have better luck looking for the 200gb dcp remux or 1 tb 4k prores The Subreddit for all things 4K Blu-ray, reviews, tech and hardware. 5. A blu-ray remux will always be higher quality than anything re-encoded. Every once in a while, you'll come across a commercial Blu-ray encoded with x264 which will show the same metadata. Blu-rays are typically pressed on either a BD-25 (25GB) or BD-50 (50GB) disc -- 32GB per film is the average size of a blu-ray according to averages taken from various people's remux libraries. Vyndros and Vertag are pretty good for shows. Sherlock 1080i BluRay REMUX vs 1080p BluRay none REMUX, which is best? Question Hi Im about to download theBluRay REMUX copy of all of the seasons of Sherlock (the BBC one) but I noticed season 1 and 2 are 1080i and its not in 1080p however season 3 and 4 are in 1080p. Or just the theatrical 4k with the HD extended editions included too? This thread is talking about the 4k trilogy though, with the tower on the front, vs. I've heard REMUX is the most original source quality you can get. When you remux something you take the original files or streams contained within the original multiplex and reorganise them into another multiplex without altering the original files in any way. Edit: Not sure why the downvotes, a webrip (as opposed to a webdl) is a recording of a stream, it's a re-encode of a re-encode. a high quality encode. I have the option of a 10gb 4K streaming copy, or a 20-25gb 1080p Blu-ray remux copy. com 4K forum, there are lots of user comments there. Universal kept those for themselves. - Oppenheimer. Whether the difference between an encode and a remux is perceptible will depend on the encoders settings, your eyes and your hardware (in some cases, especially with anime, encodes can be preferred over remux) but with a 65'' tv and QXR (which isnt known for transparent quality), unless your We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. true. X265 is far more capable than avc/x264 so consider that too. 1, frame rate same as source/variable, MKV You have an SDR display so just ignore HDR. Quality wise there is no much difference to notice between remux and a Blu-ray. The original audio tracks and video track are untouched, which means it is basically an exact copy of the Blu-ray in question, just in a video container that your media player can deal with. The Blu-ray itself is already (almost always) a loss of quality from the original source recording, so I don't see the point in storing a 20 - 50 GB file when an 8 - 15 GB file will rival the quality at a level of 95 to 100% of the BR itself. The BluRay's data is copied as an mkv file. In my process, the backup process takes much longer (30+ minutes per disc) than the remux process (~10 minutes per disc). However, the remaster definitely offers a sharper image. But also keep in mind, blu ray discs are ALREADY encoded. When I get a HDR TV I will likely keep 4K remux as well. All Blu-ray encodes, besides 4k should be AVC (H264). DTS 28 votes, 10 comments. I think you’re confused with what you are actually asking here. Aug 6, 2018 · Definitely the 4K version, the Blu-ray release from 2010 should be avoided at all costs and the 2008 release is OOP and quite dated but still the better of the two Blu-ray releases. But it bothers me a lot during this scene. However , I only see the 2D Extended version of the film with a REMUX of that size (well, 36gb), so I'm guessing it wasn't the 3D version. Anyway, most people avoid remuxs unless they have space to kill because a good bluray encode can be as good or almost as good with significant space savings. to. Nikt0 / OFT : For small size x264 Bluray encodes specifically all his encodes has 5700 kbps video bitrate (which is decent) and around 15k movies from him which basically cover almost every mainstream movies ever released from old to new ones PlayHD: they are from FL and they release bluray remux to 1080p/720p x264 bluray encodes Blu-Ray means it's been ripped from a blue ray disk, the quality can range from a near native 35gb file to a more typical 8-10gb file, with quality ranges to match. Subreddit for all things 4K Blu-ray, reviews, tech and hardware. So technically, when a scene encodes a blu ray rip. One thing to consider would be that 4K is usually "encoded" in 10 bit colour range meaning it can have 4x the colour range of 8 bit, 256 colours vs 1024 colours. Theres been a few times when a superior master was used for a streaming/broadcast copy or the bluray was fucked up due to bad filtering and such leading to a webdl or even hdtv rip being superior. Tdarr is a free software which can scan your libraries and automatically process the files to make them fall within specific parameters you have set beforehand. Question Interstellar. ACC/VC-1/HEVC more to indicate the remux. Reply reply   My go-to, currently encoding The Matrix 4K with DV/HDR10: H. 5 TB so far). If we wanted to extract that content from the disk, we would see that it would take up a lot of space on our hard disk, and that is where the famous BDRip and BDRemux come into play. Traditionally before dv webdls became common it meant remuxes using video frames or audio tracks from other blurays. Well If you want the best quality available then remux is they way to go but will eat a lot of space. It is the bitrate that differs between UHD remux and streaming That is, your calculations have an average of 33 GB per blu ray rip. I have to knock the file size down at least a little to make this work. The best IMO are VII, IX and RO with Ep III coming in 4th (overall score for PQ/HDR/Audio). I bet they had to shrink the file size to fit the movie in the disc to save on costs and that the actual remux file is much higher quality, but much larger in file size. …though I hear that set is really good, and has updated color grading from the OG Blu-ray’s (which was a major complaint people had), and all the extras Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 1080p Remux vs 2160p Web Download . New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. 265 (10bit) Dolby Vision 6 212 Kb/s I have a 65 inch 1080p screen, whats better for me 1080p remux or 2160p blu ray? Usually 2160p blu ray is lower size but whats better for quality Any REMUX should be an untouched 1:1 copy of the Blu-Ray/UHD so the uploader shouldn't matter. 709 at the same time. Odyssey. All that said, in general if done by a skilled encoder, an encode from a Blu-ray is generally going to be higher quality than a Web-DL. Way. the remastered Blu-ray’s afaik. I would go for the REMUX, maybe delete some after, or buy extra storage. There are outliers tho. 3gb while the remux is 27. I have a 4K TV. I'm referring to "teams" that touch up Blu-ray ray sourced material from digital artifacts and pressing errors etc. 1 Atmos track, or just get the Blu-ray release? And let's just assume that ripping the Blu-ray results in the same general bitrate for comparison purposes. There is no correct answer. A direct rip[1] from the UK Cells at Work! Blu-ray includes: Writing library: x264 core 157 r2935 545de2f We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. You may "prefer" the results of their tweaks but it is not what the original creator intended (the film's editor) Editor's don't prefer Blu-ray errors. It's between the original series and the remix/blu-ray where the real deal breakers are born. I know this isn’t a perfect comparison but its good enough to see the difference. Resolution-wise the 4K disc wins out too, though the standard Blu-ray is no slouch. But apples to apples, it would then depend on how you watch the content. PSA is reliable for just-released individual episodes and movies, at least until somebody with a higher bitrate puts something up (they don't do blurays of most shows though, and some stuff still only gets a 720p release there). Bluray. Make sure you dont confuse webrip with webdl, those are not the same thing. So far the quality has been good and the files are just as big as discs. Different webdls (I assume the dv files youre getting are webdl, because otherwise the remux should have dv as well) will be different qualities in comparison to the bluray, and different movies will have dv layers that add more or less to the overall experience. If you are more of extras loving guy like deleted scenes or making of movie or any edited scenes etc then go for full Bluray. Especially if it's from a good p2p group. VLC has always been known to have hdr issues, which might be your problem, provided once again we’re talking about an actual remux. Though a good Blu-ray player will process the file a bit better then a cheap streaming stick. The Blu-Ray remaster is very authentic, the colors are great and smaller details tend to show up better compared to the remaster. Would the quality of a 4K Blu ray played through a Blu Ray Player connected to a Receiver be better than a 4k Remux file played on an Nvidia Shield through Kodi? As Remux is lossless would the quality be the same? I have a feeling that the “remux” in the 4k Blu-ray isn’t really “remux”. By contrast, streaming services tend to top out at around 17Mbps This is compared to standard 1080p blu-rays Blu-ray, the standard for high quality home cinema, has generally adhered to a maximum bit rate of about 40Mbits/s for 1080P movies The important part here is remux vs not remux but you may see x264/x265 more common to indicate an encode, and remux. DTS-HD. Check out the Blu-ray. FYI: The current practical maximum speed for Blu-ray Discs is about 12× (54 MB/s) . The result is the same. How different is the x265? Its all about the bitrate. UHD. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. BluRay 2160p REMUX bit rate: 46. It's never going to be as good a quality as a blu-ray 4k with HDR on my LG oled is entirely worth it - difference vs same 4k on 2016 Samsung 4k is night and day. DISCORD SERVER… DVD and Blu-ray collectors share pictures of their latest buys and pickups, pictures of their entire collection shelves, we have contests for FREE DVDs, Movie Party nights (watch a movie with 15 strangers), experts give advice and help find the best deals, and more! The scene where they fly above the clouds in M3 is the most jarring when you compare the original to the recent Blu-ray remaster. Idk what this other guy is saying. Blu-Ray is not really compressed like streaming content. Not looking for a discussion about size vs effectiveness ala Randy in South Park about his ppsize, just trying to get input from others like me about where you're getting your needs fulfilled now (public sites, not New to the 4KUHD discs, have enjoyed buying them. 3 inch screen, though — you would have to sitting your face against the screen and actively pixelpeeping while pausing. It means they’ve taken the video and audio from a 4K Bluray disc and converted it to mkv format without any re-encoding. There are more variables than that, such as encoding settings. H. For example remux 4k weights like 60 gb and has around 60 mbit bitrate, I found good encodes x265 4k dv+hdr10 with 32 mbit bitrate, truehd audio source and weights only 30gb. HDR or not, the video will play the same on an SDR display. So a BluRay release without the 'remux' tag means that the media has been reencoded and there is loss of quality, while 'remux' means it is Dec 4, 2024 · A remux is a copy of a Blu-ray just put in a container that your TV can play, I havnt compared but I don't see the point as it should be exactly the same, especially since they are the same size they would be the same quality aslong as your player is capable of utilizing HDR etc. BDRemux would mean the video, audio and subtitles were simply put into a Matroska container without any alteration (so no loss of quality). UHD Bluray is around 60 Mbps H. x265-RARBG. The Scene groups will always tag these releases are COMPLETE. Or check it out in the app stores REMUX is exact bluray quality. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 3 is a remux of the 1080p Blu-ray Disc 4 is a 1080p encode from the 4K Disc 5 through 8 are the 1080p The files labeled "Remux" are uncompressed Blu-ray discs files so they should be the same quality as the disc. Plus, I wouldn't want a 4K Blu-ray based on their Blu-ray release with their revisionist color scheme. I generally prefer 1080p Blu-ray to 4k streaming due to compression artifacts from low bit rate of streaming. I didn't ask which release type would offer the highest quality overall, since a BluRay REMUX or large BluRay-Rip will obviously be superior in quality to any WEBDL. A disc and a remux will always be 1:1 in both video and audio quality. Even worse sometimes. This means that if there's a race between Scene groups to release a Blu-Ray, there's only one winner. it/8bddu7 Remux will be purely movie and nothing shit. I say on average, but some will only shrink by about 25% and others shrink more than 50%. I think TGx is more reputable, but the BEN version has IMAX, Dolby Vision, and HDR10 PLUS but I don't need all the extra audio tracks of Italian and Spanish. Back when DV support was added to MKV and Plex I remuxed the originals (anything with DV) to include the DV layer, these play flawlessly too, and visually there is no I just took photos of my TV playing both versions of the show. BluRay - Vague terminology, can be used for either a full bluray, remux or encoded release. They're lossless compared to BluRays, but BluRays aren't true lossless as that would result in a single movie being terabytes of size. SpaceTime. For a while now I've been using Handbrake, but I've got a few questions First, what is the difference between remux and re-encode? Hey all, I'm having a debate with a friend; Are 4k bluray remuxes of any less quality than the actual 4k disk? Like if the file has roughly 40gb++ depending on the movies length, is tagged with "REMUX" and is by a somewhat known or reputable ripgroup it should be an actual exact copy of the disc correct? An actual 4k remux — not a transcode, but a remux — will look completely identical provided everything in the chain properly supports the format. A multiplex is a stream or file that has multiple other files or streams contained within it. Just an example: A Haunted House 2 2014 1080p Remux. Video quality is significantly worse. I can't say which source it is per the rules but recently I found the amazon web-dl of the show was far better than the bluray-remux. AVC DTS-HD MA 5. Same with audio. 1080p. 2160p WEB with the lossless audio track from the Blu-ray A bluray rip from a bluray is essential just ripping the movie and potentially one audio track. Using a REMUX or a Complete BluRay RIP is best for encoding a movie with any codec, be it H. Either way, you’re never getting the “original” film format. 265 is the codec. If you were watching it on a big screen, there's absolutely a difference between a BluRay (encode) and WEB-DL. I'd go for the NF web-dl or webrip for Black Mirror S04 as there are known issues with the blu ray mastering. 1. The BluRay is the full disc, and the remux is made from that. So I bought the 4K Blu-Ray a few days ago because I thought: "This amazing movie must be looking even better in 4K HDR. I found Oppenheimer’s equivalent volume was at -17db, though thanks to the dynamic range I watched it at -15db and rode the louder scenes (which were shaking the whole house). Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 4k remux vs x265 encode bitrate question . But how different is that from a Web-DL as you'd think a direct download of a file would still be the best. 264, because the codecs supported by blu-ray were MPEG-2, H. I guess part of me hoped iTunes uses the opportunity to have access to the uncompressed copy, and if they used some comparable or better encode settings, it could be very good. It heavily depends on the movie/show. So a BluRay release without the 'remux' tag means that the media has been reencoded and there is loss of quality, while 'remux' means it is lossless. The reason why I’ve put 4k web-dl before 4k bluray is that 4k web-dl has more than enough bandwidth for a 1080p display so 4k bluray will be overkill. You just have to check the file size. If you don’t think physical media quality is superior to streaming, that’s totally fine. I would suggest you grab 1 of each, and try to see if you can tell the difference. The difference will vary between the movies (as expected). lol has downloadable IMAX, iTunes, Remux, 3D, Dolby Vision, and even 60 up to 144 FPS movie conversion content! (Also has Dolby Atmos audio) Of course, it won't show in the searches because it's a pirate site that's why you gotta research more like on youtube. Hi I am extremely new at this, but I am trying my best to learn. QXR encodes the video, lowering the quality to make it smaller. A remux is when you rip a Blu-ray/DVD without transcoding the video. In your example, DD+ means Dolby Digital +, which is a lossy codec. 2021. REMUX. olamovies. x265 is an encode using the h265 247 votes, 119 comments. Kinda depends on a movie to movie basis and your personal preference. 265 bitrate, and 4K Netflix around 20 Mbps H. These movies are typically around 40-60gb, or ev While i agree with what you stated, i doesn't appear to me that you answered my question. HDR10. 1 HEVC REMUX-FraMeSToR I have a 4K HDR OLED TV. I do have a NVidia Shield and just started a Plex share with a large server. of course its a case by case things but I would say most of the time the bluray is better. If bit rates are ok for a 4k video web-dl is the way to go. Aug 10, 2022 · When we buy a movie on Blu-Ray, we are paying to see that work with hardly any loss of quality. S01. BLURAY. Hybrid remux mean multiple sources were used, it does not have to mean hdr + dv. 1-GHD[TGx] I all got them from 1337x. It's a whole different feel, the colors are COMPLETELY different. I've heard that REMUX is the highest quality format for movies. The BluRay rips the good ones are about the same size as the original BluRay, sometimes they reduce the size by removing audio tracks or video tracks like if it came with a 1080p and a 4k version. mkv. 2160p. Your proposed 30% savings would have a 23GB file. This is the amount of data sent to your screen every second. DTS 42GB… This is a subreddit for people interested in blu-ray, ultra blu-ray and in general physical media. What was the source? Who did the encode? A well encoded, Amazon 4K HDR WEB-DL could look better than a 1080p remux. 2023. I'd like to get a better refinement of these particular qualities, but not sure of the best way to get that. If you want to count pores, wrinkles and facial hairs in closeups, the 4K disc is the way to go. My instant response is that the file with the largest size should have the best quality, but not so sure. A bluray remux is a 1:1 file from the disc. 1080p Blu-ray is ok too, Blu-ray is usually far more better at audio quality tho. Remuxes are exact bluray quality. I have several examples of large >70GB files that are labeled WebDL's, but seem more like Bluray-2160p instead. It’s not just adding audio tracks though, some groups will compare video tracks from, say, a US BluRay vs German vs UK etc to find the best video track, use that, and also include appropriate audio tracks. I'm looking at 2 files, one of them is a REMUX which is 140GB and the other is x265 less than 10GB. Also for those remux ones you should have a good monitor/audio equipment. If file size is not an issue, what will give me the best quality: Movie. Lots and lots of them on remuxes if you know what to look for. Amazon web-DL are generally pretty good. So it has lost quality, if you want to go for the best use the REMUX version. REMUX is the best quality you can get This is usually true, but not always. The remix/blu-ray set removed scenes (mostly, if not all, scenery) and modified sound effects and start/stop positions of songs, and in some places, changed songs entirely. The other smaller files are compressed and lower quality. Well a remux shouldn't be an encode. 265 bitrate. What is the BDRip format? BDRip is what Blu-Ray Rip is usually called. Ultimately it's about how good the source is. It can be helpful to look at the video bitrate and compare it with the BD/remux to get an idea of how much data has been removed. A Scene Encode 2160p (with a smaller size) - Like with the same movie the Bluray REMUX is 91GB, but say a TIGOLE or NAHOM encode with a size of say 25-29 GB or maybe even 15-16GB or 16. BDRip implies the video track was encoded (probably with x264) to reduce size. All I can say is, the 1080p Remux is guaranteed to look good while the 4K WEB-DL will be a hit or miss. With 1080p REMUX 25. I keep both. HDR is an advantage of streaming over a traditional Blu-ray but a uhd Blu-ray is not in the same league, it’s significantly better. The Blu-ray will typically offer better sound, but the streamed video can also offer HDR. 3Gb A Haunted House 2 2014 1080p BluRay x264-GECKOS- 6. US Bluray disc vs European Bluray disc; Theathrical cut Bluray release vs Directors Cut Bluray release. Screw your logic and reason, screw your facts, and take your downvotes! :) I did a quick visual check of a couple of movies, Inception and Interstellar, played the original remux and new PROPER remux on my 65" OLED TV and can't see any difference at all. Since I dint have an HDR TV I also SDR convert to BT. Atmos-FraMeSToR - 61. With reference volume set to 0db (75db), normally I listen to pretty much all movies at around -10db in my dedicated theater room. As the quality depends of the release, I will try to take one video as an example BluRay 4KLight DOLBY VISION/HDR10+ x265 10Bit 4 971 kb/s Vs HEVC/x265/h. Is it worth to get remux if im kinda trying to save space, is it big difference? I have LG OLED 65 and sit around 3 metres from it. 55Gb The… Skip to main content Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home If you were to burn your own bluray disc onto a server losslessly, then thats called a remux. RAW video film files are multiple terabytes, which they are not sending to your home. I personally would always prefer a 1080p blu-ray remux over a 4k Rip. What would be the best release group for a 4K REMUX collection? Is DV REMUX always better than HDR REMUX? For example, between the two below torrents, which one would you pick? Tenet 2020 UHD BluRay 2160p DTS-HD MA 5. It is far more complicated than this and it depends from case to case, but usually blu-ray rips win when it comes to image quality Bluray discs being different releases, ex. Which would you pick? Even this is hard to answer. Anything that is not a remux, is lossy, meaning it has been tampered with and compressed. Transparent BluRay encodes are around 60-70% of remux — much bigger and better encoded than WEB-DLs. No. 264 or H. Sure, the Shout special features aren't on the 4K release but you can make your own package by combining discs. Unlike a lot of people, I download exclusively 4k/remux quality, or similar quality, with decent bitrates. How the rip and remux is encoded plays a part in quality, as rips can be "shrunk" to small sizes with compression algorithms. You are on reddit, in the 4kbluray subreddit, where a hivemind of self proclaimed 4k bluray experts will downvote you to hell and back, because todays decision is: Bladerunner is the best 4K disc ever made. Reply reply Honestly I've rarely seen a difference in a remux vs. Definitely 4k web-dl. I usually wait for the 4K remux to come out, but they don't release a 4K version for every movie, especially the ones I usually watch, but most of the time the 4K WEB-DL is available, and a little after that the 1080p Remux is out. It should be identical to the bluray just in a different container (mkv). Most people will be hard pressed to tell the difference between a good mini encode and a remux. If you have a solid tv and a great sounbar, you could use the REMUX. Other Scene groups are HYPNOKROETE, SAVASTANOS, UNiVERSUM, UNTOUCHED, SURCODE All are upgrades PQ and some in audio (ATMOS). As for the HDR part, both use HDR (as you said) so your theather set-up must be able to handle it. 6gb. Yes they’ll be the highest quality available. But due to the focus of this sub, your headline is going to mislead people to think you’re saying the new 4K discs are the same quality as the old As I've read that remux is like the best you can get as its directly from the likes of a bluray without any alterations just being put into a . A. Spider-Man. It's just a Blu-Ray. . BluRay is simply the media source. Has anyone compared playing a 4K remux mkv file ( 60-80 gb ) played via VLC on a 4K OLED TV vs watching the same movie using it's 4K bluray with a BD player ? Is there a noticeable difference in image /video quality ? Thanks, We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I would be leery of something claiming to be a blu-ray remux at only 4gb unless it's very short or not in HD. A Blu-Ray will always give a better image quality if encoded with the same settings regardless if it's x264 or x265 X264 vs X265 is more a matter of size. Remux-1080p The final released Blu-ray, remuxed into a container MKV. Remux hevc vs blu ray The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and A remux of a UHD Bluray will still be H. HEVC. Remuxes are usually straight from the source (Bluray, UHD Bluray, etc) which tend to have the best quality. An example is The Day After Tomorrow, the 2160p is 18. tecyx fwz ibhm phurnqo iravdb jtj sqotgxc qczpq kflx lmqm krywzxo tpwr irppjtp phfmhg ejnm